Taking the Heat is a great vehicle to engage law and public policy students in discussions about the difficulty of using law to effectuate change. All too often, the law school curriculum focuses on rights, as if a win is all that is required to secure institutional reform. Many schools don't even offer classes in remedies, ignoring the difficulty and conceptual challenges of actually enforcing judgments. Taking the Heat challenges students to think beyond the verdict or settlement, to grapple with how institutions change, how leadership transmits signals and how institutional culture evolves. It forces students to think critically about the skills lawyers or public policy-makers must bring to the table in order to secure lasting reform. By taking a long view, and focusing on the day to day challenges the women faced in the firehouses, the film will provoke a much more nuanced and searching examination of the role of the law, and lawyers, in leading (or pushing) social change. While right on the target for employment discrimination discussions in constitutional law or specialized courses, the film also could serve to focus discussion about the difficulty of implementing legal rights in courses on land use (with Kirp's Our Town, for example, the film could be used to focus on the limits of the law in integrating neighborhoods), or in courses on remedies or law and society. The film's sophisticated, even-handed and unflinchingly rigorous hard look at the aftermath of the legal victory make it ideal for the graduate classroom or upper level undergraduate courses.